Connect with us

24H Series

ACO in Dispute with Creventic Over 24H Proto Series

ACO in dispute with Creventic over 24H Proto Series…

Photo: Vision Sport Agency

Photo: Vision Sport Agency

The Automobile Club de l’Ouest has lodged a dispute with Creventic over the licensing rights for LMP3 in its recently announced 24H Proto Series.

The Dutch agency, known for its successful Hankook 24 Hours of Dubai and 24H Series, announced last week the formation of a prototype-only championship, featuring LMP3, CN and other entry level prototype machinery.

The ACO alleges that Creventic has not arranged the necessary licensing agreement to utilize the LMP3 platform, which they control.

A Statement from the ACO reads: “The ACO intends to respond and denies having agreed with Creventic on the organization of a racing series in 2017 called “24 Proto Series”, which is open to LMP3.

“The ACO denies having granted to Creventic the LMP3 brand, as well as LMP3 technical regulations, which are its exclusive property.

“Similarly, the use of the list of LMP3 competitors entered in ELMS, as that of future events organized by the Dutch company, was made without the knowledge and against the will of the ACO.

“On this point, as on the above, the ACO strongly denies and reserves to defend its rights.”

Officials from Creventic, including Ivo Breukers, were on hand during last month’s European Le Mans Series round at Spa-Francorchamps and released a provisional entry list for its planned opening race in Dubai featuring nearly all of the current ELMS LMP3 competitors.

Breukers said he’s been unable to reach ACO Sporting Director Vincent Beaumesnil to discuss the matter but is hopeful of coming to a positive outcome.

“It’s not our intention to hurt anybody; it’s our intention to give service to our customers and teams,” Breukers told Sportscar365.

“It’s good for [the ACO], especially if you look at the business case for the teams. They are asking us for more track time, more races, because they want to [race more with LMP3 cars]. There’s one manufacturer that’s very happy [about our series] because they see a good business case.

“I think it can only support this category of racing. What the ACO is doing is on a completely different level and intention.”

It’s understood each series utilizing LMP3 cars and the brand must complete an agreement with the ACO, as has been the case with various championships around the world, including the VdeV Endurance Series, British Prototype Cup and new-for-2017 IMSA Prototype Challenge series.

John Dagys is the founder and Editor-in-Chief of Sportscar365 as well as the recently launched e-racing365 Web site for electric racing. Dagys spent eight years as a motorsports correspondent for FOXSports.com/SPEED Channel, and contributes to other publications worldwide. Contact John

8 Comments

8 Comments

  1. Troll Me

    October 5, 2016 at 7:52 am

    24H prototype series for me!- Creventic

    Non, moi! – ACO

    Me!

    Moi!

    Me!

    Moi!

  2. NaBUru38

    October 5, 2016 at 8:39 am

    Technical regulations are property? Even Fifa and football associations lets amateur teams play without their approval.

    • N8

      October 5, 2016 at 9:02 am

      I’m asking the same question. These cars are not the property of the ACO. They can dictate how they are used?

      • Dan

        October 5, 2016 at 10:34 am

        The cars once sold to people aren’t but the name is. The ACO own the rights to the name LMP3. It’s why when P3s start racing next year they will be called prototype challenge rather than LMP3. It’s the same situation in the GT Le Man’s class. They GTLM class can only be called that with the ACO permission. The cars could still run but the name would have to change without permission. This is more a dispute over naming rights than actual technical regulationsupport hence why the brand issue was listed first.

        • Jack

          October 5, 2016 at 12:25 pm

          imsa has permission, but they call it gt le mans to make things easier to the fans. they dont think the fans are smart enough to understand the difference between gte and gtd.

        • Larry

          October 22, 2016 at 10:00 pm

          Actually, IMSA is using the LMP3 moniker but with the required permission:

          “An IMSA spokesperson confirmed to Sportscar365 that the PC1 class will now simply be known as LMP3………..”

  3. Tarek R

    October 5, 2016 at 9:02 am

    Reminds me of the GT4 formula, a 100% SRO controlled one.

  4. Edgar Sanchez

    October 6, 2016 at 1:09 am

    Wow. I can understand disputing use of the “lmp3” and “le mans” label but I find it hard to believe that ACO can dictate where the actual cars can compete. I dont see SRO stopping anyone from hosting GT3/GT4 cars

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in 24H Series