Connect with us

24H Le Mans

Bamber, Hartley Doubted “Fairytale” Win Was Possible

Bamber, Hartley thought Porsche’s race was over after front axle issue…

Photo: Vision Sport Agency

Porsche LMP1 drivers Earl Bamber and Brendon Hartley thought their hopes of victory in the 24 Hours of Le Mans were over after spending an hour in the garage early on, only to fight back and claim a famous win at Circuit de la Sarthe.

Racing alongside Timo Bernhard in the No. 2 Porsche 919 Hybrid, Bamber and Hartley dropped 18 laps behind the leader as the team’s mechanics spent more than an hour replacing the front axle on the car in the fourth hour of the race, making a fightback to victory unlikely.

However, all five of the other LMP1 runners – including the No. 1 Porsche, which retired with a 13-lap lead, and the three rival Toyota TS050 Hybrids – faced mechanical issues during the race, allowing the No. 2 car to rise through the order and move into the lead with one hour to go en route to  claiming Porsche’s 19th overall victory at Le Mans.

“The car was running OK, and then all of a sudden during the braking zone, after the full course yellow, I felt something under braking like de-rating on the front motor,” Bamber explained after the race.

“Then when I went back on power, something broke on the front axle. A whole load of smoke came in, so had to shut down the hybrid and we had to limp back to the pits.

“So at that time in my mind, I really thought that it was maybe our race done and we’d maybe have to retire, but the guys cracked into it straight away.

“They didn’t know the whole problem so they just replaced the whole complete front axle, everything inside the cockpit, uprights, everything. They did an amazing job to turn around the car in 45 minutes

“It’s a true test to how quickly they could change everything and without the mechanics today, we definitely would be back up here. Then it was a tough, tough fight.

“We were 18 laps down, so we had the goal to try and get back to the top five for the manufacturer points.

“As more and more people fell away, it became a fight for the podium and then eventually the fight for the win.

“It was incredibly nerve-wracking. A great fightback from us, and one of those fairytale Le Mans stories I think.”

Hartley added that the team felt it had nothing to lose by pushing hard upon getting back out on-track, not knowing that the pace would lay the foundations for Porsche’s charge to victory.

“The mechanics worked their backsides off. Their overalls were completely drenched, it was the hottest part of the day,” he said.

“The sun was actually inside the garage. We owe this definitely to the team as well today. That was incredible and we saw the team spirit, and then we were informed: ‘Hey look, there’s really a chance to get ahead of the P2s today.’

“It was really tight. From the calculations we made, it was going to come down to the last lap. The pace that we predicted, we were looking at not passing all the LMP2s.

“So from that point, the plan of attack was to push as hard as we could for the remaining 18 or 19 hours. The focus became that.

“We quickly forgot about that maybe we’d missed the chance for victory, and we were completely focused on going as quickly as we could.

“You can’t write these stories. It’s Le Mans. It’s always unpredictable. Sometimes at the beginning of the race you don’t believe that such a story exists. But it did.”

While Bamber and Hartley had their doubts about continuing, Porsche LMP1 team principal Andreas Seidl always remained confident that the No. 2 car could be turned around and got back out to jump the LMP2 cars through the race.

“We knew that if we could change the machine in one hour, we knew that we could still come out in front of the LMP2 cars for P5,” Seidl told Sportscar365.

“Then as we know from our [No. 1] car, there is no guarantee that you finish. There is always a chance that you finish on the podium as long as you finish.

“This is why Le Mans is so special. It’s the toughest race in the world. Whatever you do in terms of preparation, and we were really well prepared, you have no guarantee.

“This is why it’s also so magic. This is why you thank God every day when you have the chance to win it.”

Seidl confirmed that Porsche received no prior warning that the No. 1 Porsche was about to suffer a loss of oil pressure related to an engine issue, which ultimately left him with no choice but to retire the car.

“We have to check at home what it was actually. The temperature went up and we had to stop the engine as a precaution on-track,” Seidl said.

“We couldn’t have run anymore. The engine you can’t change, so there was no point keeping it on-track or risking safety cars or whatever, because what we needed was no safety car so these [No. 1] guys could push.”

When asked about the high rate of attrition in the race, Seidl said: “I think it simply shows that we push each other to the limit and above.

“We need to analyze it in more detail what the failure causes really were, because for example on our side, failures like this we’ve never had before, so we need to analyze it first.

“I don’t think it’s down to the ambient conditions and so on. But we need to analyze it first.

I have to digest what happened the last two days first.”

John Dagys contributed to this report.

Luke Smith is a British motorsport journalist who has served as NBC Sports’ lead Formula 1 writer since 2013, as well as working on its online sports car coverage.



  1. Ian

    June 18, 2017 at 12:56 pm

    I think Seidl’s quote was talking about the number 2 Porsche, not the number 1?

  2. GimmeShelter

    June 18, 2017 at 12:57 pm

    Snore. The real race was in GTE PRO. LMP1’s are just too complex for anyone to really give a damn about. And apparently they are as UNRELIABLE as they are UGLY.

    • pop

      June 18, 2017 at 1:33 pm

      agree 100%

    • Susafan

      June 18, 2017 at 1:52 pm

      Well, endurance racing has ALWAYS been about surviving, just look at group c IMSA GTP, the 70s, even the diesel era. LMP1Hs being unreliable is great for the sport, because it offers privateers the chance to kick ass

      • Jason

        June 18, 2017 at 2:30 pm

        True. Prototypes should be a survival of fittest type strategy. Leave the flat our 24 hour sprint race style to the gt classed.

      • Andy Flinn

        June 19, 2017 at 6:06 am

        Who, Susafan, ByKolles?

        They are the ONE privateer LMP1 in the WEC and at Le Mans and they retired early before even the first LMP1 hybrid experienced trouble.

        Peugeot ditched plans to enter the WEC and still can’t afford to race in the championship, Nissan left after much embarassment, and Rebellion switched classes.

        Group C and IMSA GTP survived (at least for a while) with privateers.

        The WEC needs to do something to fix LMP1 instead of pretending that all is well.

    • Jason

      June 18, 2017 at 2:29 pm

      It’s hit or miss there. Porsches p1 this year does look good. They got go livery finally. Audi in 2015 had.a good looking car, but their 2016 version was hideous. Toyota has always been ugly.

    • Kurt Maxwell

      June 19, 2017 at 1:51 am


  3. JG

    June 18, 2017 at 3:08 pm

    Well, I’ve said it before, but the reason for all the ugliness in the prototype classes -LMP2 included- is the “big honking holes.” The aero people have responded by routing air around the front and rear fenders instead of over them, resulting in the ugly 90 degree plus front fenders of almost all the cars and the grotesque WTF folded over rear fenders on the Oreca’s. The fins don’t particularly help either. The last truly good looking prototype was the Dome S102 from 2008.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More in 24H Le Mans